Elemetrik https://elemetrik.co Plug-and-Play Assessment Tools Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:31:39 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://elemetrik.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/cropped-Elemetrik-Favicon-512x512px-32x32.png Elemetrik https://elemetrik.co 32 32 TTPI Comprehensive Report https://elemetrik.co/ttpi-comprehensive-report/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ttpi-comprehensive-report https://elemetrik.co/ttpi-comprehensive-report/#respond Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:15:41 +0000 https://elemetrik.co/?p=19288 Case Studies / TTPI Comprehensive Report Aligning a 12-Person Leadership Team — First as Individuals, then as a Group. How an independent practitioner used the TTPI Comprehensive Report on Elemetrik to stage a four-part leadership alignment journey for a regional event management firm. ToolTTPI Comprehensive Cohort12 VPs RegionSingapore Use caseLeadership Alignment The Context A Leadership […]

The post TTPI Comprehensive Report first appeared on Elemetrik.

]]>
Case Studies / TTPI Comprehensive Report

Aligning a 12-Person
Leadership Team — First
as Individuals, then as a Group.

How an independent practitioner used the TTPI Comprehensive Report on Elemetrik to stage a four-part leadership alignment journey for a regional event management firm.

ToolTTPI Comprehensive
Cohort12 VPs
RegionSingapore
Use caseLeadership Alignment
The Context

A Leadership Team that had Stopped Agreeing.

Same debates every quarter. Guarded feedback. A CEO who didn't want another offsite.

"

I don't want a workshop.
I want them to see themselves first.

CEO, regional event management firm

Leadership Friction

An independent leadership consultant in Singapore was engaged by the CEO of a mid-sized regional event management firm. The twelve-VP team had grown misaligned.

Decisions were stalling. Feedback had become guarded. The CEO wanted each VP to first understand themselves with real depth, before any strategy conversation.

Why TTPI Was Chosen

The consultant chose the TTPI Comprehensive Report on Elemetrik — the only tool profiling all 20 personality traits across 6 behavioural clusters with individual enablers, derailers, and reflection prompts built in.

How It Ran

All 12 VPs completed the inventory independently. Reports were generated immediately, with no setup fee and no manual processing — the whole cohort was activated in under a day.

0 VPs assessed
0 Programme stages
0 Traits per profile
0 Behavioural clusters
The Engagement

A Four-Stage Process -
Group, individual, Group, Individual.

The practitioner alternated between group-level pattern reading and individual depth — letting each stage feed the next.

1

Stage 1 · Group

Group Training & Trends Reveal

A full-team workshop using the group-level TTPI overlay. Where the team converged, where it polarised, where systemic blind spots existed. No individual reports shared yet.

90-min group session
2

Stage 2 · 1-on-1

Comprehensive
Debriefs

Twelve individual 75-minute sessions. Practitioner walked each VP through their full 20-trait profile, Enablers, Derailers, and Reflection Questions per cluster.

75 min × 12 VPs
3

Stage 3 · Group

Strategy
& Alignment Offsite

All twelve cluster snapshots overlaid in one room. Group conversation on convergence, polarisation, blind spots — now with everyone armed with self-awareness.

Full-day offsite
4

Stage 4 · Group

Review
& Reflection

Closing session four weeks later. How each VP experienced the journey, what shifted in the room, what behavioural commitments held.

2-hr review session
Dark Animated Insight Graph
The Insight

What the Group-Level
Overlay Revealed.

Twelve VPs plotted across the six TTPI clusters. Tight clusters reveal alignment. Wide spreads reveal latent friction. Collective dips reveal systemic blind spots.

Group spread across the six behavioural clusters

Sten score range across the 12-VP cohort. Each band shows where the group landed.

Tight (aligned) Moderate spread Wide (polarised) Collective dip
Avg Band
Drive for Results
7 – 9.5
Process Orientation
4 – 8
Innovation Orientation
2 – 9 (polarised)
Resilience
4.5 – 7.5
Emotional Awareness
2 – 4.5 (collective dip)
Influencing Orientation
2.5 – 9 (polarised)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

STEN SCORE →

✓ Aligned

Drive for Results

Everyone wants to win. Common identity confirmed.

⚡ Polarised

Innovation · Influencing

Where the recurring debates are actually rooted.

⚠ Blind Spot

Emotional Awareness

Why feedback in the room had gone guarded.

Glassmorphism Report Panel - Simple Cards
Why this report

When the Comprehensive
Report is the Right Call.

Built for moments where depth matters more than speed. Where individual patterns become group-level conversations.

Best fit

Use it when depth creates the value

  • Small, high-stakes cohorts where every individual matters
  • Leadership team alignment & founding team work
  • Executive coaching engagements that need narrative depth
  • Succession & promotion-readiness conversations
  • When you can invest hours per person and want full ROI on that time

Not ideal

Look elsewhere when speed matters more

  • The cohort is hundreds or thousands of participants
  • The format is self-led with no facilitator debrief
  • Speed of interpretation matters more than depth
  • You need a one-page artefact participants can read in 5 minutes
  • For those — use the TTPI Snapshot Report instead

The post TTPI Comprehensive Report first appeared on Elemetrik.

]]> https://elemetrik.co/ttpi-comprehensive-report/feed/ 0